Today we live in the land of make believe. We live under systems that puppet themselves as something they are not. We live in a world where we are regularly fed disinformation and misinformation, and where deliberate omission of information is the norm. Information that challenges everything we think we know exists underneath the propaganda and the distractions we take in daily, but the information needs to be looked for, it needs to be found. There is paradigm shifting knowledge that is factual and true though it is not made apparent, nor disclosed to us.
The natural and valid question is why? Why would this be so? The answer to why is multifaceted and becomes more apparent to us as we focus on the facts. Broadly speaking, it has to do with power, control, and money. Most of us could grasp this and recognize it to be part of our existence, but what if it doesn’t have to be? The finer details of this money, power, and control trinity reveal the ‘whys’ as one looks deeper and gains a more expanded understanding of the many fallacies we unknowingly uphold and sustain.
An interesting, confusing, and unsettling reality which most of us have no knowledge of is the fact that central bank officials, like those of the private corporation called the Federal Reserve Bank “enjoy sovereign immunity”. We’ll look at a little known court case citing this fact but first let us define sovereign and immunity. And for further clarification and understanding, sovereignty is also defined.
Sovereign–A person, body, or state in which independent and supreme authority is vested; a chief ruler with supreme power. (Black’s Law Dictionary Fourth Edition1951 page 1568)
Sovereignty—The supreme, absolute, and uncontrollable power by which any independent state is governed; supreme political authority; paramount control over the constitution and frame of government and its administration; the self sufficient source of political power, from which all specific political powers are derived. It is the supreme power by which any citizen is governed and is the person or body of persons in the state to whom there is politically no superior. (Black’s Law Dictionary page 1568)
Immunity—Exemption, as from serving in an office, or performing duties which the law generally requires other citizens to perform; Freedom from duty or penalty; the term aptly describes an exemption from taxation; a particular privilege. (Black Law Dictionary page 885)
*Don’t let the language intimidate you, the following court case and information will make this come to life in your mind*
A barely mentioned law suit that every American would benefit to know about for the sheer fact that it exposes the corruption and hypocrisy we uphold and ignorantly agree to is civil action no. 00-CV-12485-RCL. Reginald H. Howe (a board member of the Bank for International Settlements) vs. the Bank for International Settlements, Alan Greenspan, William McDonough, J.P. Morgan and Co. Inc, Chase Manhattan Corp., Citigroup Inc., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Deutsche Bank AG, Lawrence H. Summers in his individual capacity, and Paul O’Neill Secretary of the Treasury. On the first page of the judge’s ruling it states, “This case involves allegations of ‘an unholy alliance of high public officials’ and ‘large bullion banks’ to manipulate the price of gold”. Further allegations were made such as the BIS defendants committing common law fraud and breaches of fiduciary duty, along with Greenspan, McDonough, Lawrence Summers and the BIS violating the Fifth Amendment of the constitution by depriving Mr. Howe (the plaintiff) of property without due process of law.
A side note: In 1994 while Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States, Alan Greenspan became a Director at the Bank for International Settlements, the apex of central banks which some refer to as the “Gold Cabal”. This is one example of the major conflicts of interest that take place regularly.
The status of sovereign that the bank officials hold is mentioned by the judge numerous times as grounds for dismissal of the charges. Referring to this sovereign immune status, Judge Lindsay states, “The United States, its agencies, and its officials acting in their official capacity are not “persons” within the meaning of the Sherman Act. Though neither the Supreme Court nor the First Circuit has ever ruled directly on the issue, the circuit courts that have faced the question have been unanimous in holding that agencies, instrumentalities, and officers of the federal government cannot be sued under antitrust laws”. Later in the document the judge states that“Greenspan, McDonough, and the Secretary of the Treasury are protected from suit by the doctrine of qualified (entitled) immunity”. And for the grand finale the judge states “Even if I assume that this suit is genuinely against Greenspan, McDonough, and the Secretary as individuals, I conclude that their conduct was protected by their qualified immunity as executive officials”.
So basically, it is not relevant that the charges may be true and factual in the face of dealing with an individual or corporation with sovereign status. This status alone will get a case dismissed regardless of the evidence. This case is a revealing read as it cites other court cases with rulings where there was a sovereign entity involved.
The status of sovereign allows for many perks in addition to not being subject to lawsuits. According to the Agreement between the Swiss Federal Council and the Bank for International Settlements to determine the Bank’s legal status in Switzerland, Section 1. Status, privileges and immunities of the Bank, Article 4 part 1. states that “The Bank shall enjoy immunity from jurisdiction“ (the power to apply the law;the legal right to exercise authority). There are four exceptions to this immunity, one for example is “in the case of any civil action against the Bank for damage caused by any vehicle belonging to or operated on behalf of the Bank”. How nice of the Bank to waive their immunity for such cases. Article 4 section 3. states these perks, “The Bank shall enjoy, in respect of its property and assets, wherever located and by whosoever held, immunity from any measure of execution (including seizure, attachment, freeze of any other measure of execution, enforcement or sequestration”.
Pretty interesting…these perks. It gets better. Article 7 lists Tax exemptions. Section 1. states “The Bank, its assets, income and other property shall be exempt from direct Federal, cantonal, communal taxes” (town/village taxes). It goes on to read “With regard to buildings, however, such exemption shall apply only to those owned by the Bank and occupied by its services, and to income deriving therefrom. The Bank shall not be subject to taxation on the rent it pays for premises rented by it and occupied by its services”.
Article 12 discusses immunity from arrest or imprisonment and immunity from seizure of personal baggage, even so called ‘experts’ by the Bank’s standards, when carrying out temporary missions for the Bank are to be treated as “Officials of the Bank so far as the privileges and immunities enjoyed by such Officials are concerned”. On and on it goes, the private central banks of the world are all under the same umbrella of the Bank for International Settlements and all holding and exercising these same “privileges” and “immunities”. Yet the public at large is supposedly required by law to adhere to the very things the Federal Reserve and other central banks exempt themselves from.
Another example, take the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance form for Combined Real Estate Transfer Tax also known as a TP-584 (this is a tax paid by the seller for merly selling their home or property). Part III states an explanation of exemption. It says “The conveyance of real property is exempt from the real estate transfer tax for the following reason: a.Conveyance is made to the United Nations, the United States of America, the State of New York or any of their instrumentalities, agencies, or political subdivisions (or any public corporation)”.
So if the United Nations sells the property, (which is interesting that they’d ‘own’ property in New York to begin with ) they are exempt from paying the transfer tax, but you and I, as U.S. citizens are bound by an obligation to pay it. Likewise the corporation, United States of America and the corporation, the state of New York are also exempt from paying the transfer tax if either entity sells the property….But yet again, you or I are required to pay it. And of course if we don’t pay it there are penalties imposed on us.
How did this happen? That we are obligated to adhere to all these “requirements” under threats of punishment, yet these Bank officials and government agencies and instrumentalities can technically commit crimes but because they hold status such as sovereign, because they don immunites and privileges, they will never be held accountable for their actions. There is a whole history as to how this happened, way too extensive to share here. Start learning about sovereignty, look up terms like ‘citizen’ and ‘person’ in the law dictionaries and you’ll start to get an idea of what is going on here.
The overall lesson is that the systems in place are not there by chance or luck, but they are meticulously put in place and operated in specific ways that keep the controllers in control of the masses i.e. you and me. There is much to wake up to and now is the time to see these oppressions and fallacies for what they really are.